Engineer Ethics Essay

The roles of engineers argon respectively wide. Amongst the major responsibilities for engineers atomic number 18 rule, construction supervision, consultation, toil procurement, commissioning and worry etc. Engineers ar responsible to give the highest regard to his profession and communicate himself with integrity when executing his task. For example a good design base would pull in to include two important aspects that is to say design adequateness and cost effectiveness.In addition, engineers ask obligation to generate design dissolvents that ar environmental friendly at the same time contact the demanding requirements of client. Engineers confound a duty of care to the environment, society and to their precious customers or clients. They would have to generate design that fulfill the design clauses in the engineering codes of design, meeting the requirements by the divers(a) Governmental Departments and corporate design solutions that are environmental friendly w hich induce minimum negative impacts to the surrounding environment and society.Besides, engineers would have to take into consideration the cost suggestion of their design solution to their clients. This has caused considerable dilemma in engineers, as they have to balance cost deductive reasoning of the design solution with other factors such as quality, efficiency and various socio-economy factors. In the context of a developing country like Malaysia, in some cases, clients however have different mindset from that of the engineers.Clients are more than concern about the cost implication of the generated design solution they are more interested in design solution that is cost effective and yet fulfills the minimum design requirements by the Government. In this respect, clients would normally favour for design solutions that are cost effective, that stay within their budget. Some clients would incorporate project budget that is far inadequate which requires the engineers to sa crifice the quality and long-run efficiencies aspects in their design solution.This has obviously contradicted with the engineers interests of incorporating optimum design that would guarantee long-run efficiencies and easy maintenance. In addition, a non-up-to the standards design solution that obviously with an associated disgrace construction cost would mean that the engineer would be getting a much lesser consultation fees in make that the engineering fees are normally proportional to the cost expense of the project. However these two factors, namely the cost factors and quality are normally indirectly roportional to one another. This has make the engineers life extremely tough and difficult. Engineers are constantly wondering if they should go for expensive design solution that would definitely give both long-term efficient operations and maintenance and most importantly getting a higher professional fees, or go for an ok design solution that might not be able to guarant ee the quality aspects of the project and yet getting a lower professional fees.In view of the dilemma that engineers are constantly encountering in balancing capital expenditure with optimum design for efficient operations and maintenance, engineers should by all heart combine both the design and cost aspects in the process of generating design solutions for their clients. Engineers should not produce a cheap design solution that does not comply with the relevant code of practices with the purpose just to please their valuable clients, hoping for more projects. Neither should they generate expensive design, ignore the cost implication of that particular design and with the purpose to obtain higher professional fee.