A Comparison Between Dulce Et Decorum Est and Pro Patria Essay

The for the first time in the public eye(predicate) War was the first rightfully modern contend. Its atrocities and huge dying campana changed communitys views of contend drastic t bulge ensembley. professional person patria, by Owen Seaman and Dulce et decorum est by Wilfred Owen are both war poetrys pen around the time of the First World War, and as such share trustworthy sur subject properties. However, the two poems differ tre mendously in their implicit meaning and intentions, tolerant the two poems many subtle differences amongst their texts. twain poems use illustration. Seaman uses metaphor when mentioning the brute sword and sol runrs u transgressiong noted scutcheons, a blaringly inaccurate image to state up the idea of chivalry and knights in shining armor, giving that the fighting would be fair and glorious, as irrelevant to the plentitude slaughter and unimaginable tortures spelled out in Owens Dulce et Decorum est. seaman withal makes use of ant hropomorphisation, making England out as some expectant, good but enigmatical creature. He refers to England as a macrocosm of some sort, writing of its pleas for ease at the nations bar, stating that England affected to go to war to make its honor. Owen uses metaphor to immortalize the state of the soldiers in his poem, saying that the men were drunk with fatigue. The use of allegory is more found only in his poem, when he talks about soldiers bended reiterate, wish beggars under sacks and coughing like hags. The use of simile as hostile to metaphor adds to the realness of the poem. both(prenominal) war poems have religious undertones. The use of Latin in both texts aids this, mimicking the Latin masses of the Catholic Church. Seaman says that those left(a) at home whilst their sons go to war must be strong in doctrine and in prayer and that they should study what finishering we may consecrate, suggesting to the people back home to turn to their faith for comfort, a nd to be willing to give up the luxuries of a quiet life for the great good. Dolce et Decorum est, on the differentwise hand, uses the idea of the devils face to describe the expression of a accelerator pedal victimHis hanging face, like a Devils sick of sinThe comparison also describes the world fatigue of the soldier, what atrocities must a devil be to be sick of sin?Both poems are trying to affect the publics views on the war. pro Patria is essentially a propaganda poem, an invention used to great effect during the Boer war and revived at the advent of the First World War. The poems betimes references to honor and duty are to farm young men into singing up for the army, fabricating images of glorious victory in their minds, and conservatively avoiding the nitty gritty mechanics of it, the living in squalid trenches and the likelihood of death.The later sections of the poem are addressed to the parents of the warrior sons urging them to keep a stiff upper lip, or as he p uts it to hush all vulgar clamor of the street. The lawsuit for this is that if every time a experience received a letter from the M.O.D tell her that her son was dead she were to rush out into the street screaming OH MY GOD, MY POOR get at HES GONE other mothers and fathers would have reservations about sending their sons off to war. Therefore the silence of bereaved parents of worrier sons went some way to helping the recruiting serjeant-at-laws job.Dulce et Decorum est is the perfect turnaround of the propaganda that is Pro Patria. Whiles Pro Patria uses misleading metaphors Dulce et Decorum est attempts to create the realities of war. Where Pro Patria attempts to glorify war and depict it as honorable, Dulce et Decorum est shows the grime grime and suffering that went on at the front line. The impassiveness of the soldiers to the gruesome death of the gas victims as they fling him in the cart (the use of the word flung stress the fact that this was not unusual and that i t had happened before), the comment of the soldiers as beggars shows a stark occupation to Seamans proud and portentous warrior sons.In structure the poems are sooner confusable, Dulce et Decorum est take careing to be near a parody of the older Pro Patria. Indeed when read line by line alternately from different poems, the poems seem to compliment each otherEngland in this great fight to which you go,Bent double like old beggars under sacksAlso, the lastly stanzas of both poems use very similar rhyme patterns. Pro Patrias intermediate lines rhyme best with test, and Dulce et Decorum est rhymes appetite with est in the same lines (in relation to the end).Both poems encapsulate their message in the last lines, the finishing pleas of Seamen for parents to send their sons to war, and the solemn Latin verse of Dulce et Decorum est warning people not to indulge in flag wavingMy friend you would not tell with such high zest,To children,the old lie Dulce et decorum estPro patria m ori(How sweet and fitting it is to die for your country)Both poems are from around the time of the First World War, Pro Patria was create verbally just before the outbreak, written during the conflict.I believe that the stance taken by the authors stems from their experience of the war and the time at which they were written. Seaman did not and could not kip down what was to happen in the Great War, as it was yet to happen when he wrote the poem. Owen, on the other hand, had been at the front line, and had seen what he was writing about, and felt a need to tell others what he had seen, as opposed to Seaman who was writing for the government.