13 Angry Men

13 Angry Men 05/16/11 By: Sheraud Baiza A Boy is on Trial for firstly degree absent. 13 of us jurors will curb to answer whether or non the son is guilty. We completely see what is at take a chance here, so we must make sure all in all of our decisions argon hi-fi and fair to everyones liking. I, for one, rely that the son on visitation is NOT guilty, due to the factors of reasonable doubt that juror 8 has pointed out clearly to us so far. We ar all familiar with the old firearms deposition against the boy, even up? He claimed to have memorised the contend go on between the boy and his father, the boy shouting Im going to kill you!, a luggage compartment thud, and ran to the door to chance upon the boy running out all within 15 seconds. A reenac tment by juror 8 proves that it substantively took 41 seconds for the man to break down to the door, electropositive the el tracks are unbearably loud, so it wouldve been out(predicate) to hear everything accurately.

In my opinion, the old man just honestly and erroneously assumed it was the boy since he was the first one he saw running out. Also, reckon th woman who claimed to have seen everything on the other posture of the El tracks? Well, as you know shes myopic, so she wears render for her condition. However, she had them off the night the murder took place, plus it was very Acherontic in her house, so it was impossible for her to accurately see ! the boy and assume it was him. These facts should prove the boys innocence, and those of you who hes guilty should think real hard about this. For the ones who believe these facts are putrid, you wouldnt be thinking or look that if you were in the boys shoes now would you? learn to reason, we all deserve a second chance.If you want to get a full essay, hunting lodge it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper