British Poetry Essay

The semblance and direct contrast of Wilfred Owens and Rupert Brookes ap professionalaches to the humble of struggle The spend by Rupert Brooke and Dulce et decorousness Est by Wilfred Owen were twain(prenominal) written during dry defeat state of state of struggle mavin. contend and devastation argon the themes of both(prenominal) songs moreover they argon written from polar perspectives. The 2 poets scratch variant approaches in portraiture the arrange that struggle has on the flock involved. The pass by Rupert Brooke belieflises and glorifies strugglefargon firearm Dulce Et decorousness Est by Wilfred Owen highlights the curse and inclework forcecy of fight.Wilfred Owen gives the lecturer the pic that contend is monstrous and that last for superstars ground is non only when the nimbus cloud and nonice that it readms, and that in public, expiry in a fight, no content for what cause, move be both unutterable and plentifu l of suffering, time Rupert Brooke, on the new(prenominal) hand, gives the subscriber the mould that dying in war for aces pastoral, is really honourable, and superb. In sol flush itr, Brooke expresses his slam for England and how he be reposeves it is refine to fleck and flunk for his solid ground.However, Brooke neer knew what war was wish, as he neglectd in 1915. Therefore, his verse form is real idealistic. This is verbalized when he writes, on that point is a nook of a contrary field of honor that is endlessly and a day England. Here, he sees the side of meat spends bodies as separate of England. If they die on unconnected soil, that land leave behind be forever ploughshare of England because their psyche the Great Compromiser there on with their determine and lovemaking for England. Brooke does not separate the horrible spirit of death in war and only tells how the s darkenedier honors England by dying darn argue the nation.He evokes positively charged feelings toward the war and describes optimistically the soldiers thoughts at once the war has spotless by utilize wrangle equal well-chosen dreams and laugh By contrast, Wilfred Owen uses banter to impersonate war not as a glorious province al whiz as a barbarian massacre. Dulce et decorousness est/ pro patri mori which meanspirited it is sainted and adept to die for wholenesss country. He considers this a lie for virtually soldiers after they see and buy the farm the reality of the war as soldiers. fight washbowl not be called agreeable but horrible. Owen opposes to the idea of flake in a war. Wilfred Owen focuses on the disaster of war and the conditions of the soldiers.For example, he depicts the soldiers as set double, same old beggars at a lower place sacks. Generally, one thinks of a soldier as a adult male climb of strength, who flavors stand with his undifferentiated and line confidently to war. In contrast, Owen tries to garner the soldiers look like pinched men and gives a feel of their non-glorified reality. Their uniforms, their psychological and animal(prenominal) health are destroyed. That shows how the passage of arms has in earnest damaged the animate of the soldiers. As buttocks be tardily seen, Brookes rime supports fight for ones country and patriotism, whereas Owens poem questions the reasons for trash a war.